Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Latest Activities

IP Federation Brexit policy position

14 July 2016

The IP Federation policy position on Brexit is as follows:

  • Certainty is paramount to industry.
  • All accrued and pending intellectual property rights must be preserved in the UK post-Brexit. This is a top priority issue.
  • The UK must provide for the ability to obtain equivalent UK rights in the UK post-Brexit. This is a top priority issue.
  • We support the Unitary Patent (UP), and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) with the UK participating on the current terms, including the location of the branch of the Central Division in London.
  • Without a guarantee of continued UK participation post-Brexit, the UK should not ratify the UPC at present. We consider that ratifying the UPC to bring it into effect and subsequently being forced to leave the system would bring an unacceptable amount of uncertainty to industry across the UK and EU.
  • Further, certainty is required to ensure that the UK’s ratification would not threaten the validity of the UPC.
  • The involvement of non-EU, European Patent Convention Contracting States in the UPC (e.g. Switzerland, Norway) would be a potential advantage to industry, and it may be advantageous for the UK to promote this.
  • If the UK cannot or does not wish to participate in the UPC, we would prefer to see the minimum of amendment to the UPC Agreement (i.e. to remove the UK).
  • We encourage the use of the Patent Box and R&D tax credits to support the UK as an innovation-friendly economy.

Note that this is the position of the vast majority of our member companies, but not necessarily the position of one member company (Ericsson).

Previous Articles

  • Reform of the Boards of Appeal 

    The IP Federation submitted comments on EPO Administrative Council paper... 
    (July 11, 2016)
  • The IP Federation elects new President, James Hayles 

    The IP Federation is pleased to announce that James Hayles has been elected... 
    (July 08, 2016)
  • BIS open consultation National Innovation Plan: call for ideas 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the Department... 
    (May 25, 2016)
  • Consultation proposed changes to the Patents Rules 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the Intellectual... 
    (April 21, 2016)
  • Commission consultation on IP enforcement 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the consultation closing 15 April... 
    (April 15, 2016)
  • Amicus curiae brief on the questions referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal pending as case G1/15 

    The IP Federation has filed an amicus curiae brief with observations on... 
    (March 01, 2016)
  • Group B+ questionnaire regarding cross-border aspects of client / patent attorney privilege 

    Group B+ has formulated a questionnaire to gauge the extent of the problem of... 
    (February 26, 2016)
  • Trends and Events 2015 

    The annual newsletter in which the Federation reviews its previous twelve months’... 
    (February 05, 2016)
  • Consultation on proposal for changes in registered design fees 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the consultation... 
    (January 29, 2016)
  • Indian Government consultation on draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2015 

    The IP Federation has submitted comments on the draft Patent (Amendment)... 
    (November 26, 2015)